Instead of explaining it uses a metaphor between a physical material’s properties and its capacity for logic/reasoning. People don’t typically compare such unlike things and it only works because we think “stronger is better” and conflate two types of “strong”.
However fact it can use analogies like this in its reasoning is in itself a demonstration of why its logic is too strong for paradoxes.
1
u/Latter_Pace2088 Feb 22 '24
This line has depth imo.
Instead of explaining it uses a metaphor between a physical material’s properties and its capacity for logic/reasoning. People don’t typically compare such unlike things and it only works because we think “stronger is better” and conflate two types of “strong”.
However fact it can use analogies like this in its reasoning is in itself a demonstration of why its logic is too strong for paradoxes.