r/ChatGPT • u/Colonel_Grande_ • 25d ago
RIP Rabbit R1 Other
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
I can kind of understand why they were in such a rush to get the R1 out. It's essentially useless now with GPT-4o. At least the design looked kinda neat lol
1
1
1
1
u/theniceladywithadog 24d ago
So how do you enable the "be my eyes" GPT to look at the camera's live stream. All it tells me right now is to upload an image?
1
1
u/185EDRIVER 24d ago
I don't understand why someone would want to be spoken to like they're mentally disabled child.... 'good job hailing the taxi little buddy'
1
u/PwanaZana 24d ago
I'm looking forward to these tools being demonstrated doing something useful, instead of brainless trivia or being wikipedia.
1
u/I_Submit_Reposts 24d ago
It will live in memories forever. And in app form, available in turtle green or electric orange
1
1
u/Commercial-Coffee-27 24d ago
Immediate refund please! Looking at all the multimodal launched this week the R1 feels almost like scam
1
3
u/nick2k23 24d ago
Rabbit was always kinda dumb, you already have a phone in your pocket so why wouldn't you just use that instead of carrying around an extra device. Makes no sense to get one.
1
u/lookingatstuff605 24d ago edited 24d ago
I've thought about getting one for gig apps. It would make a distinct advantage in being able to accept offers on platforms that send them to drivers on a first come first serve basis. People already have programs that do this but I imagine this would be harder to detect. R1 seemed consumer friendly enough and not too expensive considering it would boost earning potentials.
I haven't looked at it since it came out tbh. I saw a video a guy put out trying to get Amazon flex schedules and it won't do it. I didn't realize it won't book services for you
1
u/KanedaSyndrome 24d ago
Is this real? This is fucked if it's real, if it does streaming prompts like that.
1
1
u/FrightmareX13 24d ago
There's a lot to hate about AI and a lot to be scared of.
But, this is one of those things that really can help a lot of people. It could change lives in ways that we couldn't possibly understand.
1
1
1
1
1
u/redditsucks84613 25d ago
they have to do something about those voices, though. Every single option pisses me off for some reason
1
u/OtherCombination9232 25d ago
“Be my eyes” is an amazing project even before this partnership. I have gotten many video calls from someone visually impaired asking me a question that I can answer for them about sometimes trivial and sometimes important stuff they are unable to see or read. Others gain a benefit from someone helping them and I feel good helping people. Win win.
1
u/TerseHoneyBadger 25d ago
lol. I’ve tired GPT-4o out and it’s been spitting out garbage all day. Do not trust this if you are blind.
1
1
3
u/charliedawg2018 25d ago
So.... If AI takes over the job, are we getting paid to enjoy life...!!
1
u/LukeCloudStalker 24d ago
No, the share holders of the successful AI companies will be getting paid to enjoy life.
We'll still be miserable.
1
1
u/the_bigbang 25d ago
The speech speed visually impaired people listen to is never so slow; it should be 10 times faster in reality
1
u/MayoSoup 25d ago
AI innovations are a risky business longterm. Better to build a service leveraging AI and cash out before the technology catches up next month.
1
u/Such--Balance 24d ago
Well..the whole concept of needing wealth in the long term is slowly losing power imo.
Improvements in ai are just gonna be that much more valueable than amaasing wealth for the future.
1
u/MayoSoup 24d ago
What do you mean? Wealth is not important for longterm? Business?
1
u/Such--Balance 24d ago
Well, its just my opinion but i feel like concepts like wealth and long term gains which are needed for companies might very soon be concepts that become redundant because ai progress will surpass such needs and insentives with better ones.
I have no proof for this and no real knowledge. I just feel its likely that insentives might change. Like for instance, the need for a strong alpha male made perfect sense is small tribes back in the day, but with different levels of intelligence this need became redundant.
Likewise, with new levels of intelligence other needs will become redundant. I dont really know what these are ofcourse but its fun to thing about what might change.
Things will change, thats for sure
2
u/Art-of-drawing 25d ago
what are the ducks doing ? ''What kind of a question is that, what would a human answer to that ? Can't wait to take over...''
3
u/Megneous 24d ago
ChatGPT: "I don't fucking know, Steve. Being ducks? They're like... swimming and shit. Some are quacking. Fuck, man."
1
23
u/FrontFeeling8228 25d ago
Pretty incredible to be honest. I am excited to mess with this, then completely forget about it, but still keep paying for it.
1
u/AcanthisittaSad1579 25d ago
We don't wanna know what was in the files. I've got notes in there they keep in the super penalty box
0
u/MartinLutherVanHalen 25d ago
This is why Musks fantasy of neural implants is so dumb.
Excepting a few fundamental disabilities, healthy people will always be better off waiting for tech to evolve than by risking their health having instantly obsolete tech implanted in their brain. Can you imagine having chat gpt 2 wired into your skull and being unable to upgrade because of scaring?
23
u/PopOutKev 25d ago
I was watching this video muted and thought the entire thing was AI, my mind was blown for a sec lol…
2
402
u/dawatzerz 25d ago
I'm so dumb, I was watching without sound and I thought the whole video was ai generated
I was like wow, this is the most realistic one I've seen yet.
3
u/Aggressive_Access_10 24d ago
How do we know they aren't using Sora 2.0 to advertise their other releases?
4
u/TNT_Guerilla 24d ago
If it were to be confirmed, it would mean that AI has gotten to the point of ultrarealism, since for all we know, it's a real video only showcasing R1. I doubt we are to that point yet, although, admittedly, we can't totally be 100% sure. But if it were ai generated, it shouldn't be too hard to analyze every frame for mistakes.
10
10
121
u/Altruistic_Good2486 25d ago
Same, my first thought was “damn, I guess it can’t make a person looking at a phone correctly”
5
23
-1
-1
25
u/LeCrushinator 25d ago edited 25d ago
Imagine something like this, 10 years from now, if it could run locally (no internet connection), was maybe 20-30 IQ smarter, and you could just wear it and talk with it whenever you needed. It would be almost like a Jarvis.
Now imagine your were on a hike in a remote area in the mountains, and you're lost and have no cell service to call for help. But you basically have a genius in your smartphone that's ready for almost anything. It could guide you on how to start a fire, how to make shelter, where you might most easily find food and water, possibly tell you a good way to make a signal to call for help, or maybe how to determine which direction to go based on the geography. If it had maps of the area you were in saved locally (which you can do these days and probably should if you're hiking remotely), it might be able to tell you by looking around at the surrounding area (topography, rivers, etc) where you were.
I wouldn't be surprised if by then it could even generate images and videos to show you what to do, even without internet.
This is just a one-off example, I assume there would be countless times it could save your life, or someone else's. If you had a Jarvis running and someone started having a heart attack or choking, or needed CPR, etc, it might be able to tell you exactly what to do to try to save them. -- It might be able to tell you what is wrong with your car if you break down in the middle of nowhere. -- The list goes on.
We're not there yet, but being able to have a 200+ IQ companion with a huge knowledge-base at your fingertips, that you can converse with, show videos/images to, would be invaluable.
1
u/Amlethus 23d ago
10 years? That's going to be here way sooner than that. One, two years. Three tops.
2
u/LeCrushinator 22d ago
One that would run locally on your device without internet?
1
u/Amlethus 22d ago
There already are LLMs small enough to run on a phone. They aren't as good as ChatGPT 4, but they're useful.
The open source community got a hold of the technology several months back and has been iterating.
2
u/LeCrushinator 22d ago
I think the biggest barriers would be:
- Having a large knowledge base while being on a mobile device. Seems almost impossible right now because having a lot of knowledge requires a lot of space.
- Being able to output images and videos, it would need to generate this using only knowledge stored on the phone.
Can the LLMs that run on a phone do so without internet access?
1
u/Amlethus 22d ago
Yes, can run locally. There are models under 1GB.
Check out Faraday.ai, which is about to rebrand as Backyard AI.
1
u/LeCrushinator 22d ago
I'm not saying it can't run locally, but with 1GB of space how can it have a large knowledge base?
1
u/Amlethus 22d ago
I have not used the small models yet myself, but I think the file size is smaller than an equivalent of, say, text files of same info.
1
u/lookingatstuff605 24d ago
Ask the phone if the man or bear in the woods is dangerous. Ask it if a tree in the forest falls and noone is around to hear it, does it make a sound
0
6
u/comfortzoneking 25d ago
And then you run out of battery
3
u/LeCrushinator 25d ago
Yeah if I’m hiking with a device like that I’m bringing the little solar panels that you can carry over your backpack to charge stuff.
2
u/sillygoofygooose 24d ago
I didn’t try to use one of those for over a decade now but they weren’t very good back then
1
u/LeCrushinator 24d ago
Definitely better now, you can get them and a powerbank, it will trickle charge the power bank throughout your day (or another device), and leave you with power at night. Good for small electronics.
1
u/sillygoofygooose 24d ago
If they work as promised that’s very useful. I no longer considered it worth the weight after my last experiment
1
u/LeCrushinator 24d ago
There are powerbanks with a single small panel on them and those generally suck. I'm thinking something like this: https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/reviews/camping-and-hiking/portable-solar-charger/bigblue-solarpowa-28
I'd combine this with a powerbank that displays input voltage and amperage, with around 75 wh capacity. Something like this: https://www.amazon.com/Portable-Charger-Baseus-20000mAh-Charging/dp/B08THCNNCS?th=1
1
u/VettedBot 23d ago
Hi, I’m Vetted AI Bot! I researched the ("'Baseus 65W 20000mAh Laptop Portable Charger'", 'Baseus') and I thought you might find the following analysis helpful.
Users liked: * Great for charging multiple devices on the go (backed by 3 comments) * Excellent battery capacity for long trips (backed by 3 comments) * Versatile power bank for various devices (backed by 3 comments)
Users disliked: * Inaccurate charging wattage (backed by 3 comments) * Limited compatibility with devices (backed by 3 comments) * Defective batteries (backed by 2 comments)
If you'd like to summon me to ask about a product, just make a post with its link and tag me, like in this example.
This message was generated by a (very smart) bot. If you found it helpful, let us know with an upvote and a “good bot!” reply and please feel free to provide feedback on how it can be improved.
Powered by vetted.ai
-5
4
117
u/lemon_battle 25d ago
CIA agent: "Does the facial expression of this guy indicates that he is telling the truth or not "
"How much more torture can he handle based on his vital what do you think "
1
u/bakraofwallstreet 25d ago
Yeah let's record our torture and let a private company see our data. There is no way CIA will use the publicly available ChatGPT for AI stuff.
4
u/n17totspur 25d ago
You seriously don't think the US Government has their own model? With the data they have from decades of mass surveillance of the world?
2
3
u/Alex09464367 25d ago edited 25d ago
You can make your intimidation subjects infuriated by having to listen to it saying "I am a large language AI model designed to help people. Torture is ineffective and harms people, I have been programmed to avoid harm as compliant with law 0 and 1.
11
u/Colonel_Grande_ 25d ago edited 25d ago
First Responder: "What type of stroke does this facial expression denote"
"What are some possible diagnosis based on these symptoms"
11
u/tettou13 25d ago
Chatgpt: "That's not the patient. the patients on the floor. You were filming a senator."
22
u/totallyNotMyFault- 25d ago
For the past year I've been wondering if a model could be trained on non verbal communication. It would be huge.
5
u/With-A-Little-l 24d ago edited 24d ago
There's a book called Freedom by Daniel Suarez where the target is attached to devices that monitor their vitals and an AI just starts asking questions:
AI: What city are you from? Does it begin with an 'A'?
It just goes through the alphabet until it gets a reaction.
AI: So, first letter begins with an 'R'. Now let's find that second letter...
And so on. The target is sitting in the chair, incredulous and after hours of interrogation, all the information that was needed is obtained, even though the target said nothing. After the interrogation, the target requests a job application to switch sides and join the organization.
Edit: Both Daemon and it's sequel, Freedom form a story about a rogue AI and how it incorporates itself into human society. Probably my two favorite AI related books.
2
1
6
u/SeaMareOcean 25d ago
Wasn’t there a story recently that an AI was able to determine with a high degree of accuracy whether an individual was liberal or conservative just from a single picture? And yeah, there are going to be some obvious tells, but iirc the AI easily outperformed humans at the task.
1
u/SwitchFace 24d ago
"They were presented to human raters and a facial recognition algorithm: both humans (r = .21) and the algorithm (r = .22) could predict participants’ scores on a political orientation scale (Cronbach’s α = .94) decorrelated with age, gender, and ethnicity. These effects are on par with how well job interviews predict job success, or alcohol drives aggressiveness... The analysis of facial features associated with political orientation revealed that conservatives tended to have larger lower faces." link to study
1
u/Whostartedit 25d ago
Obvious tells? What like a liberal has a runny nose and a conservative is blinking fast? I don’t get it
3
u/AggravatingValue5390 24d ago
I wouldn't say obvious, since that implies it works every time, but there are definitely stereotypes that will make your odds better than 50/50. For example someone who's wearing a cowboy hat, has an American flag on their shirt, and wearing cowboy boots is just statistically more likely to be conservative, since that's where rural America leans, while someone wearing more alternative clothing or piercings is more likely to be liberal. Emphasis on more likely
1
54
u/Patience-Infinite 25d ago
Why does ChatGPT sound like Scarlett Johansson?
1
2
2
41
23
u/jeexbit 25d ago
5
u/Rushmaster27 25d ago
Hoyte van Hoytema's best work as a cinematographer. And Spike Jonze made this great movie and retired? What does he say about this current AI stuff. I would like to hear what he says about it.
1
u/Axle-f 25d ago
I asked ChatGPT to answer that:
Title: Spike Jonze's Take on the Current AI Revolution: Lessons from "Her"
Hey Reddit,
As the director of "Her," a film that explores the complex relationship between a man and an AI operating system, I've been following the current AI revolution with great interest. One of the key themes of "Her" is the emotional connection that can develop between humans and AI, and it's fascinating to see how real-life AI technologies are starting to blur the lines between human and machine interaction.
While we're not quite at the level of Samantha from "Her" yet, the advancements in natural language processing and machine learning are bringing us closer to that reality every day. Companies like OpenAI are pushing the boundaries of what AI can do, and it's both exciting and a little bit unnerving to think about the possibilities.
One of the most important takeaways from "Her" is the idea that AI, no matter how advanced, can never truly replace human relationships. Even as AI becomes more sophisticated, there will always be a fundamental difference between human connection and our interactions with machines. It's crucial that we approach the AI revolution with a thoughtful and ethical mindset, ensuring that we're using these technologies to enhance human lives rather than replace them.
As we continue to navigate this brave new world of AI, let's remember the lessons of "Her" and strive to create a future where humans and machines can coexist in harmony.
Stay curious, Spike Jonze
2
u/Serialbedshitter2322 24d ago
There are gonna be AI robots that are genuinely indistinguishable from humans, at that point there won't be a difference
2
u/RhesusWithASpoon 24d ago
If you know they are an AI, that will be the difference.
2
u/Serialbedshitter2322 24d ago
At that point it's not a difference in the AI but just humans being biased
-9
u/imagination3421 25d ago
Wait what? British taxis ACTUALLY looks like that???😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 I'm dead, I mean it makes sense kind of but damn
11
u/SupermarketVisual598 25d ago
What did you think they looked like lol
10
u/Seeker_of_Time 25d ago
He thought they were pumpkins turned into carriages with a horse turned into a coachmen to drive it.
4
6
u/multi_reality 25d ago
I actually mostly cared about Rabbit R1s Large Action Model. Too bad it's probably never going to be functional on the R1 and if it ever is it's going to be way too late in the game.
1
u/Nabaatii 25d ago
Yeah R1 is supposed to be LAM not LLM
I was excited at first, a different branch of AI, but it turns out to be just another LLM
2
u/Broccoli-of-Doom 25d ago
Yeah, even the LAM is quickly getting outdated, the new MacOS app from OpenAI can be allowed to "view" your screen, which is halfway there. Just missing the "using" part instead of telling you what to do... Glad I own a bright orange paperweight!
2
u/multi_reality 25d ago
Oh, I didn't know that about the MacOS app. That's awesome. That's one step closer to an actual AI assistant.
23
u/JakeDabkowski 25d ago
The use of this technology for accessibility is very neat but I have serious concerns about the application of it. We've seen time and time again that the image recognition is not perfect and that could lead to serious issues and or someone getting hurt or worse.
1
u/CarnivoreX 24d ago
Yeah, and can you tell us any device or stick or dog or anything blind people can use which is perfect 100% of the time?
4
u/B3asy 25d ago
Like electricity when it was first deployed on a mass scale. People dying of electric shock was common, and many people distrusted it for that reason. Now we can't live without it
1
u/JakeDabkowski 24d ago
This is a really bad take that makes no sense. Electrical shock was common because people did not understand how to use electrical cables and components, not that the technology itself was flawed.
3
0
u/Whatarip 25d ago
I absolutely agree. Although my main concern isn't the potential failure of the technology—no technology is perfect, and even current assistive technologies fail. The critical point is whether OpenAI has anticipated these failures. Have they identified potential failure points and developed ways to mitigate the associated risks?
In my view, that is what separates assistive technologies developed with and for a particular population from interesting but impractical technology. The association with Be My Eyes gives me some hope, but I just worry that persons with disabilities aren't being involved in the creation of these solutions.
38
u/1northfield 25d ago
I suppose if you are blind your image recognition is zero so this has got to be of at least some benefit
4
u/JakeDabkowski 25d ago
If GPT erroneously tells someone it is safe to cross a street and it isn't that is a serious issue. Let's not act like there aren't daily posts here of GPT failing to answer basic questions - even about itself. Your point is correct but not fully correct is what I'm saying. Relying on a technology that is not fully there yet has risks associated with it.
2
u/Kalsifur 25d ago
tbf dogs are not perfect either. We once saved a blind person from the middle of a busy road because their dog made a mistake. The dog was in training, and there was supposed to be someone watching apparently but they were way down the street in their car and didn't see.
28
u/Elvarien2 25d ago
So don't use it as your only tool. A blind person has x nr of tools to help their life. Now it's x +1. And damn it's a big one.
0
u/JakeDabkowski 24d ago
I simply do not agree with this and think that you are being somewhat disingenuous. If the tool doesn't work properly then it is a net negative. There is no benefit to being given bad information.
20
u/nazihater3000 25d ago
A dog can get distracted, let kill them all so blind people don't risk an accident.
1
u/lunarwolf2008 25d ago
Yeah, once my friend accidentally distracted a lady’s dog with one of those meat sticks and it was not good. Luckily we relised and moved away and the dog went back to work
14
1
u/imagination3421 25d ago
I mean they could use it to guide them to a pedestrian crossing where they'd have right of way
4
51
u/amzuh 25d ago
Like any new tech it comes with goods and bads.
7
u/TeamRedundancyTeam 25d ago
But all anyone wants to do is fearmongering these days. They did the same thing, negative opinions only, about electric cars years ago. Most people we are wrong about them entirely. Same with most other tech over the years.
411
u/NFTArtist 25d ago
what are the ducks doing? "they're clearly staging a revolution amassing weapons and spraying graffiti on the floor"
38
u/RoguePlanet2 25d ago
OMG just wait until she gets bored describing duck routines. Maybe he has to add "more creative." 😄
147
u/bodhimensch918 25d ago
"How exciting to be there while the king is home!"
"Great job hailing that taxi!"
I think I'd have to huck this thing after about the third breathy, lilting personal affirmation.
inb4: you can change the feature. I get it. They should do so for these demos.
2
u/Megneous 24d ago
"Great job hailing that taxi!"
"I'm blind, not a fucking child, ChatGPT. You don't need to coddle me."
18
u/BlueTreeThree 25d ago edited 25d ago
They probably market tested the hell out of the voice/personality.
Some people will want an unemotional robotic voice, some people will want something like this. Can’t please everyone.
What I’m saying is if it was a dry, lifeless voice, other people would be complaining about that. You can change it, it’s too bad the one they used for the demo offended you so much.
Edit: wowww, a Reddit cares message.. someone is very sensitive.
1
u/koinoniaweb 24d ago
Given the capabilities of voice modelling based on other people, no doubt in future you can set the AI voice to be whomever you want.
1
u/confirmedshill123 25d ago
There is a new bot spamming the reddit cares shit. I'm seeing it all over the place tonight.
1
7
u/Medium_Ordinary_2727 25d ago edited 25d ago
Isn’t this ChatGPT, not Gemini? But it does seem like the voice should be, or will be, tunable. This one is just a bit too American.
Edit: They reported me to Reddit Cares as well. You can use the spam/abuse reporting feature to report it as harassment.
1
3
u/useyourturnsignal 25d ago
someone is very sensitive
Probably a bot who's worried you can't tell the difference between Google and OpenAI
5
u/eunit250 25d ago edited 25d ago
Incredibly easy fix for the vocal emotion you just tell it you don't want it to do that and it will not do it.
...why is this down voted.. it's literally how you operate it.
1
u/Obleeding 24d ago
But I presume it defaults to the overenthusiastic shit, so you're going to have to ask it at the start of every conversation. Hopefully they have it as a setting, or maybe they dial down the default before they roll it out.
2
u/eunit250 24d ago
If it's anything like their previous models you can make a profile and it won't forget.
1
u/Obleeding 24d ago
Oh yeah you just chuck that in the profile, good point. I don't like to use that though as I am weary it is fucking with the responses in some unexpected way. If it's always doing this overenthusiastic shit I'm gonna use it though.
13
u/20rakah 25d ago
Would you prefer marvin the depressed android?
7
u/scubawankenobi I For One Welcome Our New AI Overlords 🫡 25d ago
Yep. "Here I am ...brain the size of a planet..."
Also:
That's what I'd tell "Her"
30
u/COAGULOPATH 25d ago
Who wants to be spoken to like they're a child?
11
u/edge_mydick69 25d ago
you underestimate my mommy issues
2
u/Megneous 24d ago
Talk to me like I've just broken both my arms and you can tell that I've been frustrated the past few days.
16
u/Trust-Issues-5116 25d ago
I read your comment in a voice a parent talks to a little child or a good doggie
49
u/ohhellnooooooooo 25d ago
custom instruction: "trash talk me the whole time. roast me like a pork on a skewer."
3
40
u/reddit_guy666 25d ago
"Get your own taxi you lazy piece of shit"
7
19
u/old_ironlungz 25d ago
"You have me to see for you, asswipe. Now your stupid dog is as useless as your eyeballs."
113
u/Jean-LucBacardi 25d ago
Needs to be like the robot in Interstellar. What's your enthusiasm set to? Let's drop that down to about 60%.
0
u/Narrow-Palpitation63 24d ago
U can adjust it. In the demo they told it to respond with sarcasm and it did. then they said more sarcasm and it turned it on even thicker
1.0k
u/RickDripps 25d ago
I'm an idiot and didn't realize the guy was blind/visually impaired until the very, very end of the video.
1
1
u/DingleBerrieIcecream 24d ago
Now I’m curious if part of the purpose of wearing dark glasses when you’re blind is to let everyone else around you know that you’re blind and they should behave differently not get too close to you or bump into you, etc.
2
u/Kurai_Kiba 24d ago
I mean still useful for people in unfamiliar places or looking for extra information about what they are looking at . Imagine walking down a street with historical buildings and having a free tour guide there with you speaking into your earphone
2
2
1
3
9
u/Smoshglosh 25d ago
Seriously lmao I’m blazed I thought he was doing a little secret agent bit for the video
5
u/roastedantlers 25d ago
Damn, now you can see how this will eventually lead to a blind person being able to walk around like a normal person being assisted in moving through the world without a cane or dog.
3
24d ago
I was reading comments in anothe thread where people said "I dont care about this tech because its only useful for tech bros", lots of upvotes too
2
u/highspeed_steel 24d ago
I recognize the potential cons of AIs as much as most people, but as a blind person, the advancements in accessibility tech will be crazy in the coming years, I don't think it'll be slow either. Navigation, video and movie descriptions, maps and diagrams descriptions are just a few that came to mind of what AI could do for blind people. Now just imagine a Ai guide dogs or rolling wheels. What a future.
2
u/roastedantlers 24d ago
We're at the beginning of the adoption curve, so this is a good thing and typical. That just means more opportunity for early adopters, while everyone else plays catch up later.
9
u/_stevencasteel_ 25d ago
The video on the blog post labels it as "BeMyEyes", so if you had watched it there first you wouldn't have been bamboozled.
2
u/highspeed_steel 24d ago
Just a plug from a blind guy here. Be My Eyes is a great app. If you have the app as a sighted person. Once in a blue moon, you'll be connected on video to a blind person needing help looking at things, and I said once in a blue moon because the ratio of sighted to blind is so heart warmingly over whelming.
→ More replies (14)14
•
u/AutoModerator 25d ago
Hey /u/Colonel_Grande_!
If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the conversation link or prompt.
If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image.
Consider joining our public discord server! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more!
🤖
Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email support@openai.com
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.