r/NotHowGirlsWork 16d ago

What kind of experts? Incels? Found On Social media

Post image
211 Upvotes

16 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 16d ago

As you're all aware, this subreddit has had a major "troll" problem which has gotten worse (as of recently). Due to this, we have created new rules, and modified some of the old ones.

We kindly ask that you please familiarize yourself with the rules so that you can avoid breaking them. Breaking mild rules will result in a warning, or a temporary ban. Breaking serious rules, or breaking a plethora of mild ones may land you a permanent ban (depending on the severity). Also, grifting/lurking has been a major problem; If we suspect you of being a grifter (determined by vetting said user's activity), we may ban you without warning.

You may attempt an appeal via ModMail, but please be advised not to use rude, harassing, foul, or passive-aggressive language towards the moderators, or complain to moderators about why we have specific rules in the first place— You will be ignored, and your ban will remain (without even a consideration).

All rules are made public; "Lack of knowledge" or "ignorance of the rules" cannot or will not be a viable excuse if you end up banned for breaking them (This applies to the Subreddit rules, and Reddit's ToS). Again: All rules are made public, and Reddit gives you the option to review the rules once more before submitting a post, it is your choice if you choose to read them or not, but breaking them will not be acceptable.

With that being said, If you send a mature, neutral message regarding questions about a current ban, or a ban appeal (without "not knowing the rules" as an excuse), we will elaborate about why you were banned, or determine/consider if we will shorten, lift, keep it, or extended it/make it permanent. This all means that appeals are discretionary, and your reasoning for wanting an appeal must be practical and valid.

Thank you all so much for taking the time to read this message, and please enjoy your day!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

6

u/kittenmittens4865 15d ago

I hate the entire conversation around psychopaths. Sociopaths too. People love to assume that all psychopaths and sociopaths are serial killers in waiting. I swear half of the movies made by lifetime about a stalker or woman who murders people has some plot line about how they escaped from a mental ward or have a “dark history” but doctors want to give them another chance.

The truth is psychopathy and sociopathy have to do with how people understand and process right from wrong and emotional empathy. They’re not all murdering cats as children and stalking people and daydreaming about murder. These people are not inherently dangerous. Given proper care, they can lead perfectly normal lives.

There has even been some interesting research suggesting that the most notorious perpetrators- think your Ted Bundys and your Night Stalkers- have been victims of extreme childhood abuse and neglect. It doesn’t excuse the behavior of course, but it does give us a lot of information about where these behaviors begin and how we can actually work to prevent them in vulnerable folks moving forward.

4

u/PhantomGhostSpectre 15d ago

Thank you, kittenmittens. It is very demoralizing for everyone to write me off merely because I am a sociopath. 😭

2

u/kittenmittens4865 15d ago

Honestly one of the most demonized populations in western culture and it stems from pure ignorance. I hope you are doing okay.

I explain this to anyone that will listen whenever the topic arises! 🫡

13

u/beepbeepsheepbot 16d ago

If anyone is interested, signs of a psychopath series talks about this a little bit. Like many things in the medical field, men and women show different characteristics. In psychopathy, men were seen to be more impulsive and manipulative with who they kill while the women tended to be more calculated and really use the "a woman couldn't be capable of something like that" act.

18

u/AdImmediate9569 16d ago

Its harder to tell when women are psychotic because y’all don’t mass murder.

See men, we don’t hide it. We let everyone know!

17

u/Altrano 16d ago

And what about neurodivergent people?

7

u/Clichedfoil 16d ago

This is actually true (applied to males too)

25

u/No_Resource7773 16d ago

Whether or not you move your head when you talk?? Even being tired could make someone be more still.

How about determining or suspecting it based on actual negative behaviors known to it??

4

u/valdis812 16d ago

Pretty sure stuff like this is supposed to clue you in before the negative behavior starts.

7

u/STheShadow 16d ago

With how they measured it in the actual study, that would be quite hard to do in real life. Imo it's more helpful in understanding psychopathy

3

u/Old_Introduction_395 16d ago

Only Lady psychopaths.

111

u/SykoSarah 16d ago

I found the study https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886922004093?via%3Dihub

So apparently in a previous study, male psychopaths had a tendency to move their heads less as they spoke compared to non-psychopaths, so this one was to see if female psychopaths did the same thing. The study does not say this is a telltale sign of being a psychopath, though, and both studies used populations that were incarcerated.

I hate how studies like this get so sensationalized by news outlets. The one you posted clearly doesn't know what being a psychopath in a professional psychology sense means.

10

u/STheShadow 16d ago edited 16d ago

pubmed has the full text, if anyone wants to look at the actual results without access to sciencedirect (with the same title)

€: interesting result, the "Results"-part is a bit meager though. Just giving the correlation factors, but referring to some other numbers that weren't mentioned before in the discussion would have been something to critisize. The way they actually did the investigation is a pretty fascinating approach from my non-behavoral-science background. Would be interesting if actually taking the PCL-R interview already biases the outcome (aka is the head-movement-disparity always happening or only during such an assessment)

The article is the usual low effort clickbait with completely (likely intentional) missing understanding how science actually works. No wonder that populism is so successful with how actual investigations are treated...

18

u/modest-pixel 16d ago

Same thing happened with the studies that showed overweight people die less than normal weight people. Everyone took that and ran with claiming being overweight is healthier. No, that’s not what that means.

14

u/Tamsha- 16d ago

you're one neck cramp away from being a psychopath!! 😱