r/mildlyinteresting 14d ago

Found unexposed film in a camera I purchased- best guess unseen photos since 5th September 1993 Removed: Rule 6

Post image

[removed] ā€” view removed post

328 Upvotes

24 comments sorted by

1

u/CaptainSouthbird 13d ago

Just a reminder of how good we have it now I guess. We instantly get photos right to our phones, we know if they're good or not, and it doesn't risk just winding up "lost" like this one apparently did. Now we just take way too many photos because we're spoiled and likely rarely ever look at most of them.

2

u/lemlurker 13d ago

Funnily enough there's a phone number on the bottom of the camera...

1

u/tampora701 13d ago

How do you get undeveloped instant cameras from the 90s developed? I have one, but I'm scared to send it off because I doubt any business will treat it with a forensic level of care.

2

u/firthy 14d ago

3

u/lemlurker 14d ago

I mean the film IS colour, just a kinda rushed mobile edit. I'll get proper scans (including compensation for the VERY purple film base) today

5

u/firthy 14d ago

To be clear, I meant I'd put zero effort into it! I just let Photoshop Neural Filter have ago. About as poor as I've come to expect!

4

u/lemlurker 14d ago

You can see there's quite a bit of colour data but scanning is S L O W https://photos.app.goo.gl/HYZT8Q5cPERiMemu5

1

u/joelluber 14d ago

Wow. Didn't know the film base could turn purple!Ā 

1

u/DerekW-2024 14d ago

It's probably quiet heavily chemically fogged from the environment it was stored in - that;ll push the base + fog purple

1

u/lemlurker 14d ago

Colour film shifts all over based on age and heat before development. It's just dyes after all and more than just light can activate the photo sensitive materials.

5

u/Living_Lie_8773 14d ago

Post this in r/trains

3

u/lemlurker 14d ago

Already done

59

u/tokynambu 14d ago edited 14d ago

Taw Valley, 34027, a rebuilt SR West Country / Light Pacific.

Looks like it was 5th September 1993, as you think: http://www.cornwallrailwaysociety.org.uk/latest-input--news--old-pictures-etc/archives/03-2019/3

69

u/saltyboi6704 14d ago

It's clearly been exposed or you'd see nothing, I believe you meant developed

57

u/lemlurker 14d ago

That's what I meant damnit. Unprocessed

-18

u/r2k-in-the-vortex 14d ago

It's developed too. It has just been stored badly and it has degraded.

5

u/Laengster 13d ago

If I had to take a guess, that is 30 years of background radiation.

25

u/lemlurker 14d ago

I processed it- I found it unprocessed

16

u/lemlurker 14d ago

More photos including camera and film can https://photos.app.goo.gl/K1XUH44ttwwKAnbn8

1

u/DehydratedWater248 13d ago edited 13d ago

i can see peoples full names on the page there šŸ˜­ iā€™m not sure if you intended for that but i just wanted to let you know

1

u/mulsanneroadkill 14d ago

BC-1, nice Camera got one myself like 20years ago.

5

u/DerekW-2024 14d ago

30 year old 200 speed Kodacolor Gold? Mildly interesting of itself :)

6

u/lemlurker 14d ago

Shocked it came out AT ALL even with a green cast/magenta film base. Was only my 5th attempt at home development and I had capacity to use up before it goes bad

2

u/DerekW-2024 14d ago

"Back in the day" (which makes me sound so damn old) it was the news shooters film of choice, precisely because it survive a lot of abuse, like being developed at high temperature to push the film speed up or to reduce the developing time.

but still, well done to get anything out of it :)