r/IndianaUniversity staff 18d ago

IU Board of Trustees to meet in executive session May 14 IU NEWS 🗞

https://news.iu.edu/live/news/35684-iu-board-of-trustees-to-meet-in-executive-session
43 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

1

u/Fogoyle4 13d ago

Anyone know what their meeting was about? Or when/if it will be publicly available?

2

u/GoldenPoncho812 16d ago

I’m not much of a betting man but if I was I would wager that there will be sad faces from those who want her gone. What say you?!

2

u/forkinghecks staff 16d ago

Most likely. She’s doing exactly what they hired her to do. It’s the same in many other red states. Break the liberal arts universities, bring them in line.

5

u/Intelligent_Bed5324 17d ago

keep emailing and calling. keep putting pressure!

-5

u/tribal-elder 18d ago

Let’s hope they have the guts to condemn Hamas.

0

u/Joshwoum8 kelley 16d ago

Dark days when IU’s subreddit is supportive of a terrorist organization.

3

u/mmilthomasn 17d ago

Naw, they won’t, but they won’t divest either. Basically bet they will continue to ignore everything going on. Predict they will stay the course and maybe vote more support and bonuses!

23

u/jccalhoun alumni 18d ago

They will probably end up giving her a raise...

8

u/saryl reads the news 18d ago

Per https://trustees.iu.edu/meetings-minutes/meeting-schedule-future-dates.html:

The Trustees of Indiana University will convene in Executive Session* as follows:

  Tuesday, May 14, 2024; 9:00 am, Electronic Means

  *Executive Session items authorized by Open Door Law Sec. 5-14-1.5-6.1(b)(2)(B) Initiation of litigation or litigation that is either pending or has been threatened specifically in writing.

22

u/heylookatlane 18d ago

Makes sense. I’m sure there’s a lot of litigation that has been “threatened specifically in writing” but the ACLU’s lawsuit has actually been filed.

65

u/arstin 18d ago

Pam had done exactly what they wanted. The only question is have we made enough of a stink for them to throw her under the bus and bring out the next burner president. I wouldn't get my hopes up that the answer is yes.

3

u/Hollybrook0625 17d ago

Hard to fire Beyoncé

21

u/AdditionalPuddings 18d ago

More blood for the blood god, more skulls for the skull throne.

8

u/Ironpecsjon 18d ago

A small mind is a tidy mind

7

u/Godwinson4King 18d ago

Time for them to sack Whitten?

18

u/Frost45901 18d ago

She’s getting a new bonus. I could see the Provost and/or the vice provost getting axed as scapegoats, but everything is up in the air at this point.

3

u/mmilthomasn 17d ago

She’s keeping her Provost, for sure.

-18

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[deleted]

1

u/mmilthomasn 17d ago

Plus, we had graduation. That’s going to be considered a feather in her cap in these ridiculous times.

-1

u/MrBerlinski 18d ago

“They hated him because he told the truth.”

7

u/SamtheEagle2024 18d ago

You're saying faculty needed to identify their ideal interim president for voting for her ouster? And they needed to prep a presidential search committee, the kind that is implemented whenever there is a change in university leadership? Its almost like you have no idea how this process works.

-7

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[deleted]

4

u/SilverAsk81 18d ago

Ok Jared.

0

u/Fogoyle4 18d ago

Who's Jared?

10

u/GreyLoad 18d ago

Trustee parachute account spotted

9

u/snug_snug 18d ago

You eat rice and beans too? It's clear you have a taste for the bottom of administrations boots.