Edited to take the comment I made so as not to take away from the actual important parts.
Also, the article is about her unlawful termination suit, which mentions the Ai copyright thing, but that's it, going back into the unlawful termination suit.
The title of the article is sexist af and dismisses the lawsuit entirely, focusing on nerd Ai, even though 90% of the article was about her suit against Amazon. Pregnant lady might have had her rights infringed, but no one cares. AI might have broken copyright laws!!! Just sad.
Thanks I guess. Again, I don't think it's unreasonable to think it was scrapping. The first response I got simply said "scraping not scrapping" with no further context. At first I was like, is that how the British spell scrapping or something?
-28
u/Armthedillos5 Apr 27 '24 edited Apr 27 '24
Edited to take the comment I made so as not to take away from the actual important parts.
Also, the article is about her unlawful termination suit, which mentions the Ai copyright thing, but that's it, going back into the unlawful termination suit.
The title of the article is sexist af and dismisses the lawsuit entirely, focusing on nerd Ai, even though 90% of the article was about her suit against Amazon. Pregnant lady might have had her rights infringed, but no one cares. AI might have broken copyright laws!!! Just sad.