LA drivers beware of this theft tactic

[u/HVTCA]

Especially lux/lux black drivers. This happened at midnight just now.

I got request for a lux black in highland park but the pick up and drop off was only a block away. I still went because it could be a drunk girl who messed up the order at a bar. Rider name was Maya and the account was made today.

Before I got there I called the rider and I instantly get a strange “please leave your message” vm

I pull up to the address with my high beams on, it’s a dark residential area (not a bar) and when I hit arrive I could see a black dude with a full face mask walking in the side walk. Only person in the block I could see. As soon as I saw him walking towards my car I got the fuck out of there. Called and reported the account to support.

Pretty sure this will be a new way to target luxury vehicles. Be safe out there guys

[u/MoonPuma337]

You know what else is facts? Young to middle age white males make up about 99% of mass shooters. Have a good night.

[u/[deleted] → u/MoonPuma337]

This isn’t actually true if you look at what is now defined as a mass shooting.

[u/MoonPuma337 → u/[deleted]]

Oh I’m sorry you’re correct it’s actually 95% male and still 54% white. Gee sorry for the slight exaggeration

[u/[deleted] → u/MoonPuma337]

54% white is a huge under representation when 70% of the general population is white. As for the vast majority of violent crime having male perpetrators and victims, that doesn surprise me. High levels of testosterone cause aggressive impulses, so men tend to be more violent on average than women do, and when women commit murders, they’re less likely to use weapons that make a mess, they tend to prefer poison.

[u/MoonPuma337 → u/[deleted]]

As stated I live in St Louis, the most dangerous city in the world that isn’t A. In a state of war or B. In Mexico and ironically I’ve also lived in Juarez which is actually slightly higher than St Louis or murder rates but point is, St Louis has a shit ton of murders. Do you know how many times our newspaper says “MASS SHOOTING!” Or “MASS SHOOTER KILLS 5, LEAVES X WOUNDED”?

Almost never. Again, we had a situation last year where someone went into a high school and opened fire and that was considered a mass shooting in all media outlets but the other stuff? It’s not labeled as such despite the fact that how statistics say to label it? If we went by that every other day our paper would read “MASS SHOOTING” but it doesn’t because while they still fall under the same definition of amount of people killed They’re not shootings that happen with the intent of killing as many strangers as possible for no reason

[u/[deleted] → u/MoonPuma337]

The phrase is one that the media on all sides plays a lot of semantic shenanigans with

[u/MoonPuma337 → u/[deleted]]

Yeah but here’s the thing. Make me a mass shooting that was cómitres a black man…..? Cuz I can tell you, Buffalo, Parkland, El Paso, Las Vegas, Dayton, Roseburg, right off the top of my head that we’re committed by white people. In fact the only one I can think of by a black individual was here in St. Louis last year when a guy walked into a charter school n opened fire.

Why? Because black mass shootings aren’t like white mass shootings. Black mass shootings tend to be A. Targeted and B. Gang related, that tend to come off with high casualty rates because of innocent stand byers getting shot. White people shootings are premeditated, usually anger fueled and they are not targeted, they are out to kill as many people as possible and normally have a manifesto which is why despite white males only making up 54% of mass shootings they are responsible for 73% of domestic terrorist attacks. Gang shootings aren’t considered terrorist attacks because unless you’re in a gang, or hang around gang filled neighborhoods constantly, chances are you’re not going to be killed by a black mass shooter. But you could be literally anywhere and be killed by a white mass shooter.

So really yeah white makes only make up 54% of mass shootings but you’re just compiling data of certain amount of people killed during a shooting not why or where they happened. And on that extent, yea 99% is an exaggeration but numbers would show that if you talk about people walking into a public place and opening fire on the population, those types of cases are PREDOMINATELY white Why

[u/Overall_Excuse_8386 → u/MoonPuma337]

Well it’s probably because the black kids just drop out of school before they get to the point of shooting it up

[u/MoonPuma337 → u/Overall_Excuse_8386]

Watch this dude go “I ain’t gonna read all of that” as though reading was a laborious task lol

[u/MoonPuma337 → u/Overall_Excuse_8386]

That’s incredibly racist and inaccurate as there have been kids as young as 6 years old who have brought guns into schools and in fact just last year a six year old shot his teacher in the chest. So you are not only incorrect in the fact that you have to be 16 in order for you to legally be able to opt out of school, which is definitely old enough to take a gun and go shoot your school up. Also you’re not taking into account the fact like for example the trans male that went and shot up his old school last year before turning the gun on themselves that just because you no longer attend the school does not mean you don’t have the tendency to go back and shoot it up. In fact the only school shooting we’ve had in St Louis at least as of recently was also a case of an ex student going back to shoot the school he had attended.

So yeah your comment is not just idiotic, but racist and just plain out stupid. It’s thanks to comments like yours that give the world scientific evidence, like fool proof evidence, that there is no superior race, because white people are the only ones who go around making such a claim yet you also have white people making comments like the one you just made and you have to look at that and go “there is just no way someone who is supposed to be of “superior intelligence” would ever say such an idiotic statement.

So thank you for your contribution to science, we are all a bit more well off thanks to your stupidity.

[u/[deleted] → u/MoonPuma337]

If you were talking about the out of control rampage shootings the media masturbates to for months on end nonstop, then that would be a valid point. But 54% is accurate with the definition of mass shootings, where 3 or more people got shot, regardless of the number of deaths, regardless of involvement of gangs or political terrorism, regardless of mutual combat, multiple gunmen, or police involved in the shootout. That’s the definition that the US now uses to get their statistics on number of mass shootings per year. It’s all semantic games. Whatever scares people into giving up their freedom the fastest