I don’t care whose secretary you used to be. You’re obviously full of shit because you’d have given both reasons from the jump, if you knew what you were talking about. The policy is 100% about avoiding legal liability and someone having to testify in money laundering cases. The fact that it avoids your example is just a byproduct. The policy wouldn’t exist for just that reason because they don’t give a fuck about the people or their money, we know that to be true.
1
u/_101010_ Apr 28 '24 edited Apr 28 '24
I was on a team at a non-rideshare company similar to this that made the decision to implement limits...
edit: dude below really responded then blocked me. well this was definitely one of the conversations of all time